The Geiger Lund Selective Asparagus Harvester Model SP-2010

A Four-Row Selective Mechanical Asparagus Harvester.  Estimated Cost - $150,000
 

Home    

How It Works

More Illustrations of the 4 row harvester

Determining the cost of mechanically harvesting asparagus

The Challenges of machine harvesting asparagus

Meeting the challenges and solving the problems

Sample Cost-of-Harvesting Spreadsheets

How Much Money Can I
Make Using a Machine To Harvest My Crop?

Machine Specifications

New Design Improvements

Asparagus harvester movie clips  

Pictures of Asparagus Fields

Other Asparagus Harvesters (My competition)

Links  

 

 


New Improvements to the asparagus harvester

Based on what we learned from our last prototype these are the improvements that we've designed into the new Model SP2010 Asparagus harvester.

Asparagus Spear Sensor Improvements

The sensing channels are being changed from 2-1/2 inch centers to 1-3/4 inch centers providing a much greater accuracy and reducing the potential for collateral damage.

The field of view for the optical sensors is being reduced from 4 inches to 2 inches which will reduce multiple firings and the potential for collateral damage.

The lasers are being moved closer to the sensor bar improving the sensitivity of the sensors.

The sensor housing has been redesigned to make it quick and easy to access the circuit boards.

Spear Pick Up System

No design changes are being implemented to the pick up system. It works great the way it is.

Cutting System

The cutting system, which consists of the 12 pneumatic cylinders and the 12 air valves that provide them with air has been redesigned from scratch. 

We have been unable to find commercially available air cylinders that would stand up to the rigors of asparagus harvesting.  We've now designed our own cylinders. The new design uses a barrel made from 3/16" thick steel tubing.  The front and rear heads are made of steel and welded on.  This eliminates things like stretched tie rods, tie rod nuts working loose, and leaky gaskets or o-rings.

The piston rod is welded to the piston, eliminating any potential of the piston coming loose from the rod.

The front rod bearing also holds the piston rod assembly in the cylinder. The front bushing has a 1" tapered thread and screws into the front head.  This eliminates the need for gaskets or o-rings and ensures the front bushing will not vibrate loose unexpectedly.

To do a complete overhaul of the cylinder is quick and easy.  Simply unscrew the piston rod from the blade assembly, unscrew the front bushing, and slide out the piston rod assembly.  Now slide in a new rod assembly and replace the front bushing and blade assembly. It takes less than 10 minutes.  The cylinder does not need to be removed from the machine for the process.

The center-to-center distance for the air cylinders/blades has been reduced from 2-1/2 inches to 1-3/4 inches which will reduce the potential for collateral damage and provide increased accuracy.

The air manifolds that supply air to the cutting cylinders have been replaced by a single large manifold which doubles as the tool bar.  With the earlier method if a number of cylinders were firing at the same time a large pressure drop would occur in the air system and that caused the cylinders to short stroke.  With the tool bar as the manifold it is like connecting each cylinder to a tank of its own.  No matter how many cylinders fire at once there won't be a pressure drop to affect the cylinder.

The air cylinder bore has been reduced from 1-1/2 inches to 1 inch, and the ports have been enlarged from 3/8 pipe to 1/2 inch pipe.  The air pressure will be raised to 150 psi from 120 psi. The air hoses between the valves and the cylinders has been shortened.  We've switched from the Ross brand of valves to the Allenair valves that we used years ago. The Ross valves had sticking problems that the Allenair valves do not suffer from. The Allenair valves also actuate a few milliseconds faster than the Ross valves.

These changes will make the air cylinders capable of even faster cycles than they now have which will allow faster forward machine speeds during harvesting.

General Miscellaneous Improvements

The headers have been reduced in weight from over 1,000 pounds per header to about 600 pounds per header.

The SP-2010 raises and lowers all 4 headers in unison. Prior models had the headers raise and lower individually. 

We are using an oversized hydraulic reservoir to insure the hydraulics run cool.

The mechanical air pressure regulator is being replaced by an electronic pressure regulating system that will allow higher flow rates, provide tighter pressure regulation, and significantly reduce horsepower losses inherent in mechanical pressure regulators.  This will improve the cut timing accuracy.

For more details about the cost of machine harvesting check out the sample spreadsheets.