|
We ran the harvester in Pasco Washington
in the spring of 2007.
The machine does a pretty nice
job of harvesting the spears that are ready to be cut, typically
recovering about 75 percent of the marketable spears on the bed.
However, the machine
damages too many of the spears that are not yet ready to be
harvested, what we call "collateral damage". Especially the
spears that have not yet emerged from under
the ground.
Because of all the missing spears
from the collateral damage on previous days, our yield drops to less
than 50% of what a hand crew would harvest.
This last season (spring 07)
Washington State University
also tested the Oraka machine. The Oraka machine (from New
Zealand), a robotic type harvester, uses a very similar method to cut the spears, a blade
mounted on the piston rod of an air cylinder.
Their blade was slightly narrower
than ours and the Oraka machine only has the one blade. It
centers the blade on the spear an inch or so back. Once the blade is
in position, the cylinder extends, pushing the blade through the
spear and into the ground. Nearly identical to the way our
machine cuts.
The Oraka machine caused far less
collateral damage than our machine and was comparable to ours in dropped or
missed spears. The Oraka machine was getting yields compared
to hand on some days of 80% and higher, even exceeding 100% at least
once.
Even with such impressive yields
the Oraka machine is currently much too slow to be economically
viable.
The Oraka machine
clearly demonstrates that with a few changes, our cutting method can
be used without the collateral damage problem.
There are three main differences
between the Oraka machine and the Geiger Lund machine that relate to
the collateral damage problem;
1. Our blades are wider.
2. We fire too many blades at a
time.
3. Our blade angle is too high.
Our solutions:
1. We have designed custom
air cylinders that will reduce the blade width from the current 2-1/2", wide to 1-3/4" wide. (The Oraka machine has a blade
2-1/4 inches wide.)
2. Our spear detectors have too
wide of a field-of-view, and so a single spear often sets off three
blades. (equivalent to a blade over 7 inches wide)
We've re-designed the detectors for the proper the
field-of-view for the new blade width. The Machine will
fire one blade to cut a spear, or two adjacent blades if the
spear lies between two blades, but it will never fire three blades
at a single spear.
3. We've allowed for a lower
blade angle.
With these changes we expect
yields of better than 70%.
Unfortunately, Washington State
University has decided not to continue our funding for next season.
If we can find a source of
funding we will make the changes to the header, and we feel at that
point we will have a marketable machine.
Please check out the videos of the harvester:
Movie clips They are
worth viewing.
Or visit
YouTube and search for
"Asparagus Harvester".
|